Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process
All articles submitted to Anuradhapura Medical Journal are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.
Anuradhapura Medical Journal operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.
Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editors, who are supported by an expert Editorial Board.
Section Policies
Editorial
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Research Articles
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Concept Papers
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Brief Reports
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Audit
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Case Reports
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Review Articles
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Perspectives
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Abstracts
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Letters To Editor
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed